Newton's laws of motion and friction

Monday Google's Science Journal software and a smartphone taped to a RipStik was used to estimate the lateral forces generated by swizzling on a RipStik. Perhaps the technology obscured the concept of force. The idea of using a smartphone as a key laboratory tool - accelerometer, luminosity, audiometer, oscilloscope, magnetic field strength - is too tantalizing to pass up.

Wednesday I did the on sidewalk "PowerPoint" using signs on the posts to cover Newton's laws

Sir Isaac Newton’s Three Laws of Motion
Momentum = mv

An object at rest tends to remain at rest...
An object in motion tends to remain in motion…
...unless acted upon by an external force

∴ Momentum is constant
 including Momentum  =  0

When acted upon by an external force,
The change in momentum is proportional to the force

Momentum is not constant

Force  =  Δ momentum ÷ Δ time
Force  =  Δmv ÷ Δt =  m Δv÷Δt

∴ Force = mass* acceleration if mass is constant

For every force there is an equal and opposite counterforce

Attempts to demonstrate the first law run afoul of the effects of friction, which leads naturally to a laboratory exploring friction. 

Rayden and Benter explore the effect of grit

 This year the grit exploration benefitted from twelve grades of grit, up from the five in the past.

Juntwo and Heather with 12 grit grades

Tulpe and Suzanne exploring the effect of weight

Yummy working on grit in the afternoon

Venister and Ignathius study the effect of weight

Board notes.

Data showing the strongly positive linear effect of weight, the null effect of grit on the glass sled, and the negative relationship with surface area. Surface area used three double-sided sleds stacked to keep a constant weight.

Friday the students presented their findings to each other. The weight appeared to generate fairly consistent coefficients of between 0.20 and 0.36.

Saileen and Yummy

Limweidihwen and Justin

Suzanne and Tulpe

Margret and Selihter

A list of weight coefficients of friction can be seen building on the board. The 0.75 would appear to be anomalously high. 0.24 and 0.207 are up on the board


Grit would consistently produce a random result that would be about 25% of the weight. In other words, the weight alone was able to explain the force of friction being seen, the grit had no particular impact on the sliding friction of the glass. Grit graphs were made far more rational this year by the use of grit particle sizes instead of grit grades.


Surface would remain unsettled. Both groups obtained a negative relationship between surface area and the force of friction. For both the relationship was not consistent. For one group, the data appeared to be non-linear leading to the use of a logarithmic relationship.


The last two weight coefficients can be seen above: 0.36 and 0.30. This would wrap up friction and the extended unit on motion. 


Popular posts from this blog

Box and whisker plots in Google Sheets

Areca catechu leaf sheaf petiole plates

Setting up a boxplot chart in Google Sheets with multiple boxplots on a single chart