I used the same zero post as the week before and a 305 cm on center measurement. After a couple practice runs I did a run that I thought went to 1220 cm out and back. I could not make the times work, became confused, and decided to redo the RipStik run. This time I realized I was turning just past the 915 cm post, so my original data was not faulty. The graphs below retain both sets of data.
A roughly parabolic shape emerged from both runs, both runs have very similar time versus distance profiles.
Just past the turn around at an estimated 1050 centimeters.
|time (s)||distance run one (cm)||distance run two (cm)|