In class I only wrote the time and distance data on the board, the following table was constructed later as part of my analysis of whether my speed was fairly constant.
| Pillar | Time (s) | Dist (m) | Vel (cm/s) | Acc (cm/s²) |
| one | 0 | 0 | ||
| two | 3.86 | 4.6 | 1.19 | |
| three | 6.89 | 9.2 | 1.52 | 0.11 |
| four | 9.64 | 13.8 | 1.67 | 0.06 |
| five | 12.45 | 18.4 | 1.64 | -0.01 |
| six | 15.09 | 23 | 1.74 | 0.04 |
| seven | 17.84 | 27.6 | 1.67 | -0.03 |
| eight | 20.47 | 32.2 | 1.75 | 0.03 |
| nine | 23.45 | 36.8 | 1.54 | -0.07 |
A constant swizzle rate tends to generate acceleration early in the run, and I could feel the increase in the speed between pillars one and three. I started the run prior to pillar one, but only by about three meters, so I had not yet reached a constant speed as I passed pillar one.
During the summer I opted to delay the stopwatch start until the second pillar to provide a seven meter run prior to starting measurements, . This fall I returned to starting with the first pillar as zero. The small variations in speed are visually difficult to see and thus do not impact the finding of linearity for the system.
The small increase in velocity among the first three pillars and the deceleration at the run's end can be seen above. Mid-run my speed held fairly steady, accelerations remained near zero. The overall average speed for the run was 1.57 m/s, with the linear regression best fit slope at 1.61 m/s.

0 comments:
Post a Comment