Social media and technology survey

The following is a small sample survey with data from August 2024. Although the sample size is small at 19 respondents, the patterns are perhaps the only insight available at present into where the students are in social media and the technologies that they are using. The data is a part of a larger set of responses going back to August 2023. For context, some of the charts pull from the larger sample. 

Social media

August 2024 data

For the August 2024 responses, Facebook remains the social media platform on which students spend the most time. TikTok, Instagram, and YouTube are in a three way tie for second place.

August 2023 to August 2024 data

By way of context, the larger data going back a year supports the ongoing popularity of Facebook. Instagram is in second place, followed by Instagram and then TikTok. The August 2024 data is well aligned with the data since August 2023. Facebook remains a viable place in which to reach out to students and to communicate with them.

August 2024 data

First check in the morning is dominated by social media sites and messaging apps. Canvas and email are not first check sites. This has implications for communicating information such as a class that has unexpectedly cancelled due to instructor illness or other short notice messages such as a campus emergency shut down.

Technology

August 2024 data

Students still heavily rely on college computers and college computer labs to access the Internet.

August 2023 to August 2024 data

Although a third of the respondents in August 2024 depend on the college for Internet access, the data going back to August 2023 suggests that almost three-quarters of the students have home Internet access. One factor may be that home access may be bandwidth limited. Some online materials may consume more bandwidth than is available in the home. I recall students who were on home ADSL in 2021 and 2022 being unable to play Cengage videos in their CA 100 course. Large PDF files, often favored by faculty, can also be problematic on home connections. Thus students might have home Internet access and yet depend on the broader pipes of the college campus to get their work done.

August 2024 data

A look at what form of home access students have indicates that the majority of students have ADSL or fiber optic connections. 5.6% reported having Starlink or Kacifica access. There are 11% who do not have home access. Given that this survey was online there is the possibility of bias wherein the number without home access is underreported. 

August 2024 data

Legend for the above chart:
  • Dell or other Microsoft Windows laptop
  • Desktop computer in a college library, residence hall, or computer laboratory
  • Android cell phone (Samsung, Motorola, Xiaomi, other non-Apple device)
  • Apple MacBook laptop
  • Apple iPhone
  • Desktop computer off campus
  • Apple iPad tablet
  • Android tablet (Samsung, Motorola, Xiaomi, other non-Apple device)
Roughly 37% of the students are using desktop computers to complete assignments, with another 37% using a laptop computer. About a quarter of the students are using mobile devices to complete assignments. Logic dictates that faculty should be targeting the most limiting platform, even though only a quarter of the students depend on mobile technology to do assignments. If the assignment can be completed by that 25% of the students, then the students on laptops and desktops can also complete the assignment. 

August 2023 to August 2024 data

The data over the past year indicates that students continue to have both laptops and mobile devices. Of note is that 16% of the students report using a desktop off campus, but only 5.4% own a desktop computer. This is likely indicative of their use of a desktop computer owned by someone else in the family, or the use of a desktop computer in a workplace.

August 2023 to August 2024 data

When asked more broadly to list all of the technologies used to complete assignments, the use of mobile technologies to complete assignments climbs to 50.9%. While students most often may use laptop and desktop computers, they are also choosing to use mobile devices to complete assignments.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Plotting polar coordinates in Desmos and a vector addition demonstrator

Image
In an earlier post I noted that Desmos did not directly plot polar coordinates. Not only was I incorrect, but Desmos responded to my blog to correct me! Although I had at some point seen that one could define a function f(x)=3x+5 and then have Desmos calculate f(6), I had not absorbed how this might be used to plot polar coordinates. The above works beautifully . Realizing that I could effectively program Desmos, I applied this thinking to demonstrating how to add two vectors when given the magnitudes m and the direction angles theta. The graph calculates the i and j components for the two vectors and then adds the vectors, graphically displaying the result while also providing information on the magnitude and direction of the vector sum. m1 and theta1 are the magnitude and direction angle for one of the two vectors, m2 and theta2 are the magnitude and direction for the other vector. All four are dynamically interactive and can be changed. The diagram purports to illustra
Read more

Setting up a boxplot chart in Google Sheets with multiple boxplots on a single chart

Image
The  Google Statistics  add-on for Google Sheets can display multiple boxplots in a single chart. The key is the layout of the data. One column should be the variable by which the data is to be grouped, the other column should be the data to be box plotted. Set up the Statistics add-on with the data to be plotted as the variable, and the grouping column as the "by" variable. In this image I had deselected all but the boxplot option, the result was the appearance of the Moment, Standard errors, and Confidence intervals options. The default is apparently a 95% confidence interval for the mean. The result is multiple boxplots on a single chart with a common scale. The new tab that is created also quotes 95% confidence intervals for the mean. Note that as of 2018 the Google Statistics add-on cannot be found by search in the add-ons. In addition, as of May 2018 the add-on no longer verifies, possibly due to the add-on not having been updated since August 2017. One may ha
Read more

Traditional food dishes of Micronesia

Image
Clara, Jennette, and Joanie presented ground hard taro cooked in an umw, effectively a hot rock oven. Pohnpeian: rotama. Pingelapese: sero. Mwoakillese: rodma. Mortlockese: Amahd. Kosrae: rodoma. After cooking in an umw the rotama is pounded with the petiole of a palm frond. Rotama is made from hard or swamp taro, known as mwahng on Pohnpei, mweian on Pingalap, pula in Mortlockese, and pahsruhk on Kosrae. In traditional times on the outer islands the women had primary responsibility for tending the taro while the men handled fishing and climbing tasks. Joesen and Noeleen presented fermented breadfruit from the outer islands of Yap such as Woleai and Eauripik. The raw ingredients were actually brought in from Yap, Noeleen prepared the maare.  The leaf wrap is ti leaf - Cordyline fruticosa. Pauleen, Barnson, Trisha, Verginia, Con-ray, and Maylanda from Kitti, Pohnpei brought in mahi umw, koahpnoair koakihr, and uht sukusuk. Above is breadfruit umw, mahi umw, one o
Read more