danaleeling

The workshop evaluation asked faculty to respond to prompts by agreeing or disagreeing with the prompt. The responses were converted to numeric values: Strongly disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly agree Three sessions were conducted with pre-workshop titled focuses on basic training, turnitin awareness, and advanced training. The afternoon advanced training received the highest overall average rating. Combining the responses for all three sessions, the instructors found the sessions to be informative and responded that they will be able to apply what they have learned.  The basic Moodle training in the morning received the highest means for being informative and applicability. The afternoon advanced session also saw high ratings on these same two metrics. Instructors found the session to be information and useful. Comments List two things you liked most about the sessions Clear and structured  Generating Quizzes and Assignments I find all the information is useful. How to...

The field final is weather dependent. At 16:15 a rain band came over the ridge. Yet by the 16:20 start of the field final the rain has passed through. Although satellite photos suggested further bands could be inbound, the field final launched at 16:20. The first plant was Ocimum tenuiflorum at 16:25.   Jasminum sambac was the second plant. This term a southern route was taken. This route eliminates the long plantless trek from the northeast corner to the gym. Fiona, RJ, and Tisha on point at 16:26 en route to Ponapea ledermanniana. The choice of Ponapea ledermanniana was to provide fairly closely spaced regrouping locations. Centella asiatica along the walkway was the next plant and regrouping point. Cymbopogon citratus was the next stop along the walk at 16:36. Dantez, Sinae, Nakisha, and Emars at 16:37 Terminalia catappa at 16:38. This term avoided the long wait for stragglers to catch up after a...

Student evaluations of instructor, course, and course materials provide guidance for the institutions on areas of relative strengths and areas where there may be room for improvement. Although the evaluation was only distributed to students in online courses, some of those students were also in residential courses. With the evaluation used in all courses fall 2024 there were 1360 responses. Spring 2025 has received 482 responses as of 13 May 2025. Edits: Where noted below, some charts and text were subsequently updated. The last day of regular classes was Monday 12 May 2025.  Edit 16 May 2025: Spring 2025 had a cumulative submission rate that differed significantly from spring 2024  Updated 5/19/2025 In spring 2024 and prior terms the bulk of evaluations were submitted by the last day of regular classes. The few submissions that arrived after the last day of classes made no significant difference in the results. Spring 2025 the pattern of submissions was vastly different. 46% ...