RipStik acceleration
This term tight time frames did not leave enough time for multiple runs or practice runs. Based on recommendations from spring 2016 I went with a 100 cm interval to 800 cm. In this way I was mimicking the RipStik acceleration run of fall 2015 . An attempt to keep the first 100 cm over 1.29 seconds left me unstable, I never fully recovered and lost balance post 800 cm. There was insufficient time for a second run, perhaps more time ought to be devoted to this, but the lack of time was due to review coverage of the Friday quiz. Perhaps that coverage could be reduced to provide more time for multiple runs on the sidewalk, then the smoothest run could be chosen. Zero was at the post next to the intersection, above I am marking 100 cm The marks for 100 cm and 200 cm. Perhaps there is a need to try to the monotonically increasing distance model: 0, 100, 300, 700, 1200. The catch is that the sparcity of the points could lead to loss of the sense of a parabolic curve. Perhaps a 50 c...