Acceleration from d=½at² produces velocity in v=at

In this Friday exploration I sought to demonstrate that the acceleration calculated from d=½at² produces the velocity predicted by v=at. From the first equation a = 2d÷t². That acceleration a can then be used to produce the predicted velocity from v=at. The demonstration was physically based on laboratory four, thus students were already familiar with using speed traps at the bottom of a slope to obtain a velocity.


Class began in A101 where I explained the layout, theory, and times that would be needed. I asked whether the velocity predicted from the acceleration would be the same as the speed trap velocity. One student ventured the guess that they would not be the same, and I agreed. I felt that the two values would be far apart. The class then moved out onto the sidewalk. 


The 17.17 meter slope. Two runs from the post just below the sidewalk junction produced times of 12.03 and 12.12 seconds. 


The three meter speed trap is just after the turn. This had times of 1.13, 1.16, and 1.18 seconds.  Up for debate is whether a shorter speed trap would produce a more accurate velocity as the RipStik is slowing down after the turn. The trade-off would be less accuracy for a faster split time.


I have no selfie or TikTok experts in the course, so this was as good an image as I got of this demonstration. The class then returned to the classroom.

acceleration a = 2 × 17.15 ÷ 12.07² = 0.24 m/s²

That same acceleration predicts a velocity v = 0.24 × 12.07 = 2.85 m/s.  

The speed trap measured a velocity v = 3 ÷ 1.16 = 2.57 m/s. The difference in those is just under 10%, a difference fairly readily explained by frictional slowing of the RipStik via a demonstration in the classroom. 

This exercise now presages the Monday "change in momentum is force" demonstration. Might gut sense is to reduce the force as much as possible to avoid fast back pedaling which is always problematic. 



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Plotting polar coordinates in Desmos and a vector addition demonstrator

Image
In an earlier post I noted that Desmos did not directly plot polar coordinates. Not only was I incorrect, but Desmos responded to my blog to correct me! Although I had at some point seen that one could define a function f(x)=3x+5 and then have Desmos calculate f(6), I had not absorbed how this might be used to plot polar coordinates. The above works beautifully . Realizing that I could effectively program Desmos, I applied this thinking to demonstrating how to add two vectors when given the magnitudes m and the direction angles theta. The graph calculates the i and j components for the two vectors and then adds the vectors, graphically displaying the result while also providing information on the magnitude and direction of the vector sum. m1 and theta1 are the magnitude and direction angle for one of the two vectors, m2 and theta2 are the magnitude and direction for the other vector. All four are dynamically interactive and can be changed. The diagram purports to illustra
Read more

Setting up a boxplot chart in Google Sheets with multiple boxplots on a single chart

Image
The  Google Statistics  add-on for Google Sheets can display multiple boxplots in a single chart. The key is the layout of the data. One column should be the variable by which the data is to be grouped, the other column should be the data to be box plotted. Set up the Statistics add-on with the data to be plotted as the variable, and the grouping column as the "by" variable. In this image I had deselected all but the boxplot option, the result was the appearance of the Moment, Standard errors, and Confidence intervals options. The default is apparently a 95% confidence interval for the mean. The result is multiple boxplots on a single chart with a common scale. The new tab that is created also quotes 95% confidence intervals for the mean. Note that as of 2018 the Google Statistics add-on cannot be found by search in the add-ons. In addition, as of May 2018 the add-on no longer verifies, possibly due to the add-on not having been updated since August 2017. One may ha
Read more

Traditional food dishes of Micronesia

Image
Clara, Jennette, and Joanie presented ground hard taro cooked in an umw, effectively a hot rock oven. Pohnpeian: rotama. Pingelapese: sero. Mwoakillese: rodma. Mortlockese: Amahd. Kosrae: rodoma. After cooking in an umw the rotama is pounded with the petiole of a palm frond. Rotama is made from hard or swamp taro, known as mwahng on Pohnpei, mweian on Pingalap, pula in Mortlockese, and pahsruhk on Kosrae. In traditional times on the outer islands the women had primary responsibility for tending the taro while the men handled fishing and climbing tasks. Joesen and Noeleen presented fermented breadfruit from the outer islands of Yap such as Woleai and Eauripik. The raw ingredients were actually brought in from Yap, Noeleen prepared the maare.  The leaf wrap is ti leaf - Cordyline fruticosa. Pauleen, Barnson, Trisha, Verginia, Con-ray, and Maylanda from Kitti, Pohnpei brought in mahi umw, koahpnoair koakihr, and uht sukusuk. Above is breadfruit umw, mahi umw, one o
Read more