Hoop rotation exploration
This summer term the hoop rotation laboratory was made less specific, less prescriptive of what had to be measured. In the past the laboratory was guided by the following directions and questions:
In this laboratory you explored the relationship between a hula hoop diameter in centimeters and the natural rotation period for the hula hoop in seconds.
- What is the nature of the mathematical relationship between the hoop diameter and hoop period? Is the relationship linear or nonlinear?
- What is the equation that relates hoop diameter to the hoop period?
- Do hoops with larger diameters have longer periods?
This summer the intent was to leave the decisions on what to measure to the students. The concept was to make the laboratory more of a practical test of the students' ability to explore an unknown system. To remove some of the scaffolding and framework. This summer the directions were:
If the universe is mathematical, then every physical system is obeying mathematical equations.
Hoops are a physical system. Hoops come in different sizes. How do different size hoops behave when rotated around the waist?
Pair up with a partner, groups of two. One timer, one hooper. Make certain either you or your partner can hoop.
Design and carry out an experiment to determine whether there is a mathematical relationship between the rotation rate around the waist and the size of a hula hoop. In your report explain what you decided to measure and why. Find an equation that optimally fits your data. Remember to specify your variables and units of measurement in your caption and graph axes. In the discussion report your results and findings.
This laboratory is a practical test of your ability to carry out a study of a physical system and produce a report on that system without guidance.
During the unguided laboratory the students usually chose to measure the circumference. Given a dual sided cloth tape measure, they primarily chose to measure the circumference of the hoop. The students also appeared to try to either measure a single rotation of the hoop or a fixed number of rotations. The latter would prove difficult if the number of rotations was set on larger hoops. Shorter hoops would prove harder to keep aloft for the pre-determined number of rotations. Notes on time suggested that some students were recording times in minutes and seconds.
Perhaps the direction to go is away from this as a lab practical and back to specifying period versus diameter. Or five rotation time versus diameter to keep the math and timing simple. Paired partners. Then write the equations on the board. Did everyone get the same equation? Why not? What factors might account for the different results? Watching one student slow rotate a small hoop on almost no body motion this summer made clear that while the general relationship holds, there are clearly other factors.
Comments
Post a Comment