Moodle and Canvas learning outcomes assessment usage and reporting
In Instructure Canvas outcome rating scales can be set to custom values. This allows the use of rating scales that can be used to mark assignments. In addition, Canvas permits outcomes to be added to rubrics, allowing assignments to be graded by the outcome rating.
In Canvas outcomes can reside directly in the rubric and, at the instructor's option, contribute to the grade for the assignment. In Moodle learning outcomes cannot contribute to or be used to mark the assignment. Outcomes are located outside of the rubric and cannot be directly added to the rubric.
In terms of reporting, the college reports learning into Nuventive Improve via statements such as, "23 (16 females; 7 males) out of 24 students (96%) achieved near mastery or better of this CSLO."
The Moodle Outcomes report displays averages aggregated at the course level, not at the individual student level.
The Moodle Grader report can include individual student performance on an individual assignment. In the above course these assessments are currently done on every laboratory report and the aggregate performance determines student mastery.
The Grader report, however, can be exported.
Note that the Gender column, necessary for results entry in Nuventive, was added post hoc after export, as were columns L, M, N, and O. Columns L, N, and M convert the outcome rating to a numeric value. To maintain consistency with the scale in prior use, the following function is in L2:
=IFS(I2="Optimal",5,I2="Sufficient",4,I2="Suboptimal",3,I2="No evidence",0,I2="-","")
This process of adding columns and functions will have to be repeated for each assignment that includes outcomes evaluations. Then a set of overall average functions can be constructed to obtain an individual student average for each course learning outcome - averages that Canvas calculated internally and reported directly in the Learning Mastery Gradebook.
Given the high workload for repeating this process across all assignments and outcomes in all courses taught by an instructor, selection of a representative sample subset of assignments for outcome assessment might be prudent.
The results in the spreadsheet can then be used to construct the inputs for Nuventive as outlined in an earlier blog.
The one caveat is that using the 5-4-3-0 scale leads to a course learning outcome average that is different from the one reported in the Moodle Outcomes report which is based on the 4-3-2-1 scale. There is an argument to be made for shifting to the Moodle monotonic scale and using those values to determine learning outcome mastery.









Comments
Post a Comment