Statistics chapter three: basic charts
There is a 3.1 circle and column chart data sets spreadsheet that frames the introduction to charts. This data is updated from an institutional dashboard.
On Monday, circle charts, column charts, and Pareto charts were covered using the data in the spreadsheet. the data derives from an institutional dashboard in LookerStudio that pulls data from Instructure Canvas.
On Wednesday I worked the 3.1 Pareto chart homework. After working the homework on the SMARTboard using the Data: Sort range with header row option enabled, I briefly showed the class the new Convert to Table option on the Format menu. This provides "safer" sorting as preselection is not necessary. Note that the 2023 census data still has not yet been released.
Then the class engaged in the favorite colors exercise, which I lost badly when black beat blue nine to four. Green tied for third place with white with two votes each, red was a single selection. Cyan, olive green, and purple were singletons. There isn't, however, a trend. Since the pandemic blue has beat black three out of five times. There is no clear signal of a swing to black dominance.
Monday redistributed marbles based on rolls of a die to generate a pseudo-random distribution of marbles per student. Students started with seven marbles, thus no student could lose all of their marbles.
The class started with seven students at 9:00, so I stalled into the marble trading exercise. Eventually 18 students showed up.
Despite the directions given, one pair engaged in a double roll of their die. Bear in mind that students start with seven marbles and can lose no more than six on a single roll of the die. A student who rolls a one and gives away one will have six. The most they can receive from the student on the left is six, thus 12 is the largest possible number. Only by rolling again did one student wind up with 14 marbles. This created a high outlier and an opportunity to talk about the validity of a statistical study: if directions are not followed in the same fashion by those engaged in the survey or study, then the results will not be statistically comparable.
The histogram before was literally unimodal.
After was problematic. Arguing symmetry was made tougher by the lone outlier. Nothing I could do with the bucket rescued symmetry from this data.







Comments
Post a Comment