Acceleration from d=½at² produces velocity in v=at
An initial trial was done before class using the nine meter downhill by the LRC and a three meter speed trap. This failed rather miserably in showing that v = 2d÷t, which is the result of solving d=½at² for the acceleration and then substituting that into the equation for the velocity v = at. The failure appeared to in part due to my acceleration not being constant.
I started the class in A101 with the integration on the left side of the board above leading to the equation that the velocity at the bottom of a slope should be 2d₁÷t₁.
The slope on which the acceleration would occur was termed d₁ and the time to traverse d₁ was referred to as t₁. Thus d₁ = ½at₁². That acceleration should produce a velocity v at the bottom of d₁ as a result of v=at₁. Call this predicted velocity v₁. Today d₁ was 17.2 meters with the assistance of Ashmiranda sitting on the tape measure. This would turn out to help immensely.
I had a Desmos spreadsheet prepared so I could get a quick glimpse at the numbers.
When I ran the predicted velocity from 2d₁÷t₁ I obtained 3.01 m/s. When I heard that Ian had a time of 1.00 seconds for t₂ I opted to use that time for the actual velocity calculation of d₂÷t₂. That was just too tempting: to have obtained accidental
Back in the classroom I plugged in the numbers and then tried to explain that my acceleration on the slope of 0.26 m/s² explained my actual velocity at the bottom of the slope, that 2d÷t yielded the exact velocity I actually had at the bottom of the slope, and this was possible because the acceleration equations held true.
Comments
Post a Comment